Kaboom Your Photography!

Just Kerplunking Along?  Kaboom Your Photography!

Robert Frank: A Statement (1958)

Robert Frank's The Americans, photographed in 1955 and 1956, after receiving a Guggenheim Fellowship, rocked photography in 1958.

People had not seen the country the way Robert Frank did, and in the style that he used.

Popular Photography Magazine wrote:

[A] meaningless blur, grain, muddy exposures, drunken horizons and general sloppiness.

In the introduction to the second edition of the book, Jack Kerouac, author of the 1950s classic, On the Road, wrote:

Robert Frank, Swiss, unobtrusive, nice, with that little camera that he raises and snaps, with one hand he sucked a sad poem right out of America onto film, taking rank among the tragic poets of the world.

John Szarkowski, curator of photography at the Museum of Modern Art, wrote:

Robert Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America, comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces. This iconography has become a common coin, [and] here the original acuity of Frank's own sensibility is alive and relevant.

Elizabeth Kunreuther, curator at the Center for Documentary Studies, wrote:

Robert Frank's book The Americans represented a significant challenge to America's image of itself. Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Photography before Frank was pristine: carefully focused, carefully lit. Frank would intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the country in 1955 and 1956.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of a prosperous post-war America. Such attitudes can be seen in the popular 1955 exhibition: The Family of Man. Frank's work clashed with the prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote: "...I do not anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement - the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Go to Robert Frank.

Robert Frank

I am grateful to the Guggenheim Foundation for their confidence and the provisions they made for me to work freely in my medium over a protracted period. When I applied for the Guggenheim Fellowship, I wrote: "To produce an authentic contemporary document, the visual impact should be such as will nullify explanation"

With these photographs, I have attempted to show a cross-section of the American population. My effort was to express it simply and without confusion. The view is personal and, therefore, various facets of American life and society have been ignored. The photographs were taken during 1955 and 1956; for the most part in large cities such as Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and in many other places during my Journey across the country. My book, containing these photographs, will be published in Paris by Robert Delpire, 1958.

I have been frequently accused of deliberately twisting subject matter to my point of view. Above all, I know that life for a photographer cannot be a matter of indifference. Opinion often consists of a kind of criticism. But criticism can come out of love. It is important to see what is invisible to others—perhaps the look of hope or the look of sadness. Also, it is always the instantaneous reaction to oneself that produces a photograph.

My photographs are not planned or composed in advance and I do not anticipate that the on-looker will share my viewpoint. However, I feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind—something has been accomplished.

It is a different state of affairs for me to be working on assignment for a magazine. It suggests to me the feeling of a hack writer or a commercial illustrator. Since I sense that my ideas, my mind and my eye are not creating the picture but that the editors' minds and eyes will finally determine which of my pictures will be reproduced to suit the magazines' purposes.

I have a genuine distrust and "mefiance" toward all group activities. Mass production of uninspired photojournalism and photography without thought becomes anonymous merchandise. The air becomes infected with the "smell" of photography. If the photographer wants to be an artist, his thoughts cannot be developed overnight at the corner drugstore.

I am not a pessimist, but looking at a contemporary picture magazine makes it difficult for me to speak about the advancement of photography, since photography today is accepted without question, and is also presumed to be understood by all—even children. I feel that only the integrity of the individual photographer can raise its level.

The work of two contemporary photographers, Bill Brandt of England and the American, Walker Evans, have influenced me. When I first looked at Walker Evans' photographs, I thought of something Malraux wrote: "To transform destiny into awareness." One is embarrassed to want so much for oneself. But, how else are you going to justify your failure and your effort?1

1 Frank, R. (1958) A statement. U. S. Camera Annual, 115.